Heroes 5 – “A masterpiece or an unfinished product?”

"THE WRITERS ARE IDIOTS" were from Ubisoft, they are the ones who wrote the plot.

Ubi wrote the heroes (and biographies). Nival was responsible for the script.
2Uke-by_HoMM![Zavulon]
1. Three was never my favorite game in the series. Only 3rd place.
2. There was no random distribution of turns. If in 5, the hero gets the 1st turn and dragons get the 2nd, then victory is 100% probable. (Illusion on dragons and a simultaneous strike on weak stacks; as a result, an increase in morale and all subsequent effects)
In Three, all turns (the order) are known in advance.
3. Which series traditions were observed in 5?
4. Useless skills. The entire Ballistics branch, all abilities related to Logistics, the Curse and Blessing branches (completely), a number of frankly useless points in Luck, Leadership, Summoning.
5. An unclear magic system. For the Necromancer in the guild without raising dead, for the Academy not a single combat spell except Armageddon.
Which heroes were like that?