And here's about this:

Your work is implementing it based on someone else's template, 95% of which consists of other people's ideas. You yourself mentioned this, but you're the only one making claims and demands...

As I said, you're the only one who can claim co-authorship of the template, so tell us about your contribution in detail. Show logs from our chat, look at what was in the early versions for comparison, etc.

Naturally, no one will bother with this, trying to figure out who came up with what. I implemented it, I collected feedback from players, and that's it. If you can do better, go ahead.
And for now, template creation is generally a thankless and time-consuming task (especially templates like JK, which are packed with all sorts of changes). And no one wants to do it. It's thankless because, firstly, the chances that anyone will even try to play a new template are very small. JK is a phenomenon in this regard; without Freeman, who fell in love with this template, no one would know about it now. I have no problem admitting this; I try to be friends with facts and reality. But this doesn't give him the right to dictate his terms and disregard the opinions of other people.*

Added 4 minutes later

And to get to the point, I'm sick of the template (this is in response to the work you've done). It's neither one thing nor the other, neither fish nor fowl, just chewing gum from Heroes.
I'm only playing out of respect for Freeman, and it seems like the latest version is more or less decent.

So, the latest version was made according to your dictates, Stinger. You could say Stinger King is the one who shaped it.

See, even poor Stinger is disgusted by JK. Why listen to the feedback of a person who initially doesn't like the idea of the template? What's the point of adapting something for players who don't want to play it? There are already excellent templates for them: JC, 6lm10a, G+U, Clash, etc.