Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Right now, any level guild reconstruction will immediately be implemented here. And then, perhaps, many other things will appear, for example: - the ability to refuse a skill in the Witch Hut - the ability to see the type of bonus for a student unit - the removal of control scrolls from the map. That is, these are gameplay changes that, for those playing Heroes of Might and Magic, already seem natural and even not changing the gameplay, but rather removing utter nonsense, but for fans of Might and Magic, this is not utter nonsense, but rather familiar features.
This is also an unrealistic idea because some player will appear who needs some of the changes, but not others. And the discussion will start all over again. sir Davos Seaworth
But if wishes prevail over common sense (and IAPs should be in IAPs, where they belong), then FM will have to be abandoned, and it will remain a pastime for 10-15 people (plus the occasional "Oh, how cool it is, I played a couple of games - amazing. I'm going to go back to playing Heroes of Might and Magic").
Okay, then why not abandon the reconstruction altogether? Isn't that a pure IAP? But why is one reconstruction option acceptable, while another is not? This seems like double standards.