Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Perhaps in Heroes of Might and Magic II, Roland initially seems like a more worthy candidate, but look at what happens to him later. His wife, Queen Catherine Gryphonheart, took over the governance of the country, while he was captured. I highly doubt that history would have taken such a turn if Archibald had become the ruler. Firstly, he wouldn't have been captured, secondly, the people and necromancers would have united, and thirdly, as in Might and Magic, Archibald acknowledged that after his petrification, necromancy had degraded significantly, meaning that if Archibald had continued to rule, knowledge of death would have been astounding (possibly), and there would have been fewer problems with the Krigans (demons). But this is only if some fanatic doesn't overthrow him, because all geniuses are considered madmen by the common people. Archibald is our king.
P.S. Roland is an excellent warrior, but he is not a king.