Expedition: general discussions.

Maybe you should reread that post, Officer. It outlined a scale of appearance ratings, from negative, which results in a penalty, to positive, which results in a reward, and even our classmates received these bonuses.
If you've decided not to criticize the system itself, as Ples did, but instead to nitpick the specific way I linked those few words into a sentence, using the most trivial example possible, then I won't even address that point by point.
Instead, I'll say that you are wrong because you are discriminating against attractive characters. In other words, increasing intelligence and receiving fantastic bonuses to learning and, consequently, abilities, without any effort from the player, is normal and fair, compared to those who didn't increase it and are stuck with zero points, or being a tournament brute with high strength, doing well in physical education, and getting rewards for it; but when a couple of autistic characters, who sacrificed other stats to increase completely useless attractiveness for role-playing purposes, or spent money on it in the form of clothing, suddenly have that bonus removed towards the end of the game, then it's lookism, and who did you leave us with, Grandfather Theria?