Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Conclusion: the K coefficient is unrealistically high (not only G+U compared to others, but also in general for all templates)
Quite a strange conclusion. The coefficient is simply multiplied by all rating changes, so if the K coefficient is reduced by half for all templates, then the rating growth rate for all players will also decrease by the same factor of 2. In essence, one rating point will be worth two now. It will be equally difficult for newcomers to catch up with the top players, whether in the case of the top players gaining twice as many rating points with the current system, or in the case of the current rating values of the top players with a system with a K coefficient reduced by half.