What were they trying to take into account? What is the underlying idea?
Otherwise, everyone will suggest whatever comes to mind. And it will even be impossible to figure out what is better and what is worse.
A typical scenario ("they wanted to do something good, but it turned out badly") occurs when there was initially a more or less reasonable idea, but while implementing it, they misunderstood it / confused something / completely forgot the idea. Then they focused on a borderline situation, based on which some nonsense clearly emerged ("we are here" – this is what Lizard G+U currently indicates), then confusion begins, the original reasonable idea is not even remembered (everyone knows "how it should be"), several more shots in the dark, and a complete cancellation of the changes because everyone is already confused, and some nonsense has resulted.
Does anyone remember the initial idea – why was the coefficient introduced?
ps thanks to Hosenko for the link to the formula (additional question - how can I find it if I don't know where it is located?)