Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
StarhanStatistics
Registered:
Posts:454
#120
Auto-translated
Points are awarded from the bottom; if there are few players, the winners receive fewer points.
This is evident in the example.
If there were 4 people, the first-place winner would receive one point; if there were 18 people, they would receive 12 points.
There isn't a formula, of course, but one could be devised.
I also suggested determining the points based on the tournament's difficulty, just in case.
By the way, a certain group of players has already formed for each hero, so the number of participants will almost always be the same.
Added after 34 seconds I just wanted to contribute and give you a little break.
It helps.
Added after 44 minutes OptiMAL;115315
Although you are right in some ways. You could simply set limits for the coefficient with Gw-Gl. For example, if a player has already achieved a solid rating, the coefficient could be reduced, say from 10(Gw-Gl) to just (Gw-Gl). The same applies to those with a low rating. Rating limits could be established, from which the coefficient between Gw-Gl would depend.
As I understand it, we're talking about rating decay.
It should be the same for everyone, or it will become impossible to catch up with the leader