LuckyF
Auto-translated
That's completely wrong. The strength of a player doesn't always correlate with their understanding of the game. And after watching streams and reading posts from top online players, I personally came to the conclusion that their opinions are precisely what you shouldn't base your judgments on. Because, unfortunately, their understanding of the game is weak. And most importantly, they have huge blind spots, which offline players don't have.
Playing 1v1 on large maps without AI, or with very weak AI, without any attempts to improve this AI or put it in advantageous conditions, is a complete misunderstanding of the original concept of the classic game. This is where all the problems of online play arise, and the distortion of the classic game as an attempt to solve these problems – additional artificial rules, restructuring of guilds, replacing bonus creatures in conservatories, etc.
You have a unique level of self-confidence, sir, judging the understanding of top players:smile54:
Just out of curiosity, how do you reconcile in your head the fact that the best players in this game have a poor understanding of it and its balance? And why can't someone else, who understands the game like a god, come online and explain to everyone how flawed they are? Instead, it turns out that some noobs think they're top players :smile04:
discord: LuckyF#3482
icq: 681350680
icq: 681350680