badping
Auto-translated
no, I haven't played Heroes of Might and Magic, so for me, Heroes of Might and Magic is better
That sounds strong... and what language is this? :))
Personally, I like mages more. For some reason, it always seemed that spells could inflict more damage on the enemy than by improving combat skills.
In particular, increasing the "Strength" skill by 1 can only increase the damage by a maximum of 5%. At the same time, "Magic Power" increases the damage dealt by combat spells more effectively (this is most clearly seen at the beginning of the game, when there are still few troops), and some spells, such as "Bless," "Blind," or "Curse," are generally a must-have, especially in the late game, with large army sizes.
Although, perhaps the Battle Mage option is the most attractive. Who would refuse, for example, to improve the secondary skills of Attack, Defense, or Ranged Attack, especially for such truly magical castles as the Tower or Conflux.
That sounds strong... and what language is this? :))
Personally, I like mages more. For some reason, it always seemed that spells could inflict more damage on the enemy than by improving combat skills.
In particular, increasing the "Strength" skill by 1 can only increase the damage by a maximum of 5%. At the same time, "Magic Power" increases the damage dealt by combat spells more effectively (this is most clearly seen at the beginning of the game, when there are still few troops), and some spells, such as "Bless," "Blind," or "Curse," are generally a must-have, especially in the late game, with large army sizes.
Although, perhaps the Battle Mage option is the most attractive. Who would refuse, for example, to improve the secondary skills of Attack, Defense, or Ranged Attack, especially for such truly magical castles as the Tower or Conflux.
