Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'm not calling anyone sheep; it's just a metaphor! Besides, you're more like goats than sheep (this is also a metaphor).
But you're reasoning correctly (about the elections).
I don't like the fact that you're running for leader; it's not the Guild itself that I dislike, but some of its methods and principles.
I did write about the uselessness of the Guild, but if people are so attached to it, maybe I'm wrong.
If I'm elected, I'll change a few things in the Guild:
1. It's necessary to exclude from the Guild those who don't follow the charter (there wasn't a point about this in the charter, and that's a mistake).
2. The "wall of shame" should include not only people who deserve a ban but also people who have committed less serious offenses (spammers, rude people, etc.).
3. A topic should be created for particularly egregious offenders with a poll: "Ban or not ban?" where everyone can express their opinion.
4. No more agitation like "ignore him" or "let's lower his reputation." All offenders are posted on the wall of shame, and everyone "THEMSELVES" decides how to act.