Alex_R
Auto-translated
There will be practically no criticism, because there is nothing to criticize... the game was played against the computer, apparently for fun, otherwise there is no reason to spend so much time on this map... (meaning 3 months - just "grinding against computers")...
I don't see any arguments why only Tant (Necropolis) can do so well on this map, and not a Tower or a Conflux... even though I myself like to play as Tant, because he does it with the least effort!
And besides, why carry all this rabble with you? You can divide your entire army into 3 strike forces (capable of defeating everyone) and speed up the offensive, winning 4 times faster!!!
P.S. I wrote 4 because 3 armies + 1 will be added to mobility... for example, one hero with only archers - I move faster than with archers and skeletons!
I don't see any arguments why only Tant (Necropolis) can do so well on this map, and not a Tower or a Conflux... even though I myself like to play as Tant, because he does it with the least effort!
And besides, why carry all this rabble with you? You can divide your entire army into 3 strike forces (capable of defeating everyone) and speed up the offensive, winning 4 times faster!!!
P.S. I wrote 4 because 3 armies + 1 will be added to mobility... for example, one hero with only archers - I move faster than with archers and skeletons!