Discussions, post-mortems, analysis, inflated egos, and all that jazz.

Merlin, do you think it's right to eliminate even those who aren't actively destroying the planet and engaging in self-destruction?

If something like that happens – and the planet has a whole set of tools to shake off the parasitic mass of bipeds – then so be it, it can't get any worse.
This is precisely the situation where the majority determines the future for everyone.
At the same time, self-destruction is understood not only as obvious things like alcohol, drugs, war, and violence. It also includes what some religions call "deadly sins." And in this context, among my acquaintances (and I am no exception) – there isn't a single person who isn't engaged in destroying the planet and self-destruction, except perhaps children up to a certain age, and even then, with the development and spread of various gadgets and the imitation of older people's behavior, they also start down that path much earlier.