Discussions, post-mortems, analysis, inflated egos, and all that jazz.

Another question. Are you familiar with the results of the all-Union referendum of 1991 on the preservation of the USSR, in particular, with the results of the expression of will of the citizens of the Ukrainian SSR? Was everything falsified there too? And a couple more points, if we talk about the formal side of the issue (that is, about the laws of various countries). The results of World War II were accepted by all countries. The territorial boundaries as a result of World War II are inviolable (which, for example, Japan is now trying to disavow). There is no point in even talking about the statehood of Ukraine - historically, there has never been such a separate state as Ukraine. The Ukrainian SSR, therefore, is part of the state of the USSR. Regarding the territory of Crimea (the emphasis is precisely on it), according to the final terms of the Kuchuk-Kainarji peace treaty, the territory of Crimea was annexed to the Russian Empire in 1783 by agreement between the Russian and Ottoman Empires (as a result of military operations - as previously, as a result of military operations, the Crimean Khanate became a vassal of the Ottoman Empire, and then it lost its independence and became part of the Russian Empire). There is not a single word about Ukraine there. In fact, all this has absolutely no significance in the scale of the Universe. And personally, I don't care at all what flag is flying over what territory at any given time. In fact, I believe that humanity in its current form should be eliminated... But since you are so passionate about this "pseudo-statehood topic," I decided to add a little fuel to the fire, just in case it dies out - what will we use to keep warm then?