Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
— Interesting story, but you don't seem to be lying. That's good news for both of us: I won't have to extract information from you through humiliation and torture. But there's also bad news for you: you killed the people you wanted to work for. And your recklessness is of no use to me. A person like you will cause more problems than benefits. And you know too much of what you shouldn't. Do you understand?
- I understand. But wouldn't the people whose men I killed experience a shortage of personnel, which I could so conveniently fill? Not to mention that I would be clearly smarter and wouldn't allow myself to be riddled with bolts like a pig in a battle that is impossible to win. I don't think those dullards represented any sentimental value to their employers, so why not consider this, as they say, "even from a bad sheep, you can get some wool"? If I am executed, those people will lose two dullards, but if I am kept alive, those people will still lose two dullards, but at least they will gain a reckless spy in return. Who, moreover, is not a pity to lose and who will have nowhere to run from them.
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?