Grando
Auto-translated
Regarding the Igromant rating, I still want to weigh the pros and cons from the perspective of eternity:
- It has open source code, so for eternity that rating could actually prove more useful for the community, because in the event of something failing on the forum, or if ideas for changes accumulate, any random enthusiast could pick it up, just like Igromant himself this time raised the fallen Nitro banner
- The HeroesWorld rating has indeed taken a step forward in recent days, but it is still not in its final state (for example, there is a filter row; the very first idea that came to my mind was to compare my results in blue and red, but it turned out I would see no results at all in any of the filters, and there isn't even a filter by color), and given the closed nature of it all, it remains a mystery why all this is happening and how it will proceed in the future
- Igromant has had and still has his own ideas about what info he wanted to collect and what analyzers to attach to the rating, which, as far as I can guess from the HeroesWorld rating, were not even in the plans (but again, given the closed nature of what's happening, guessing is the most we can allow ourselves)
- It's only better for everyone if there are two options, both of which work, because they also keep each other's quality in check; here I am absolutely certain that it was the creation (and fine-tuning) of the rating by Igromant that made it possible to see what was wrong with the previous version of the HeroesWorld rating
Overall, it seems to me that it would be best for everyone if the Creator and Igromant find common ground, and in the event of changes being made on HeroesWorld, information about them would be provided to Igromant in a correct and adequate form, so that his rating doesn't go down every time for an unpredictable period
This time, fundamental changes were made, which probably couldn't even be discussed in advance — I'm not accusing anyone, I've stated my arguments and position; now that the foundation of the new code has been written, I think it's quite possible to agree on a working information exchange — after all, there aren't 100500 third-party developers here, but just one who is definitely known, and who needs only one thing from HeroesWorld — to correctly calculate the list of reports
(this is all, of course, if Igromant is still ready to continue)
- It has open source code, so for eternity that rating could actually prove more useful for the community, because in the event of something failing on the forum, or if ideas for changes accumulate, any random enthusiast could pick it up, just like Igromant himself this time raised the fallen Nitro banner
- The HeroesWorld rating has indeed taken a step forward in recent days, but it is still not in its final state (for example, there is a filter row; the very first idea that came to my mind was to compare my results in blue and red, but it turned out I would see no results at all in any of the filters, and there isn't even a filter by color), and given the closed nature of it all, it remains a mystery why all this is happening and how it will proceed in the future
- Igromant has had and still has his own ideas about what info he wanted to collect and what analyzers to attach to the rating, which, as far as I can guess from the HeroesWorld rating, were not even in the plans (but again, given the closed nature of what's happening, guessing is the most we can allow ourselves)
- It's only better for everyone if there are two options, both of which work, because they also keep each other's quality in check; here I am absolutely certain that it was the creation (and fine-tuning) of the rating by Igromant that made it possible to see what was wrong with the previous version of the HeroesWorld rating
Overall, it seems to me that it would be best for everyone if the Creator and Igromant find common ground, and in the event of changes being made on HeroesWorld, information about them would be provided to Igromant in a correct and adequate form, so that his rating doesn't go down every time for an unpredictable period
This time, fundamental changes were made, which probably couldn't even be discussed in advance — I'm not accusing anyone, I've stated my arguments and position; now that the foundation of the new code has been written, I think it's quite possible to agree on a working information exchange — after all, there aren't 100500 third-party developers here, but just one who is definitely known, and who needs only one thing from HeroesWorld — to correctly calculate the list of reports
(this is all, of course, if Igromant is still ready to continue)