Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

That in itself is interesting, because conceptually it is not different from, for example, mine, only the math in it is not very well-structured, which is basically its drawback.
Maybe it would be easier to collectively and persistently ask the administration to decide on a system. Then all questions will disappear.

:) And I wrote about this, that the Kamikaze system was born as a result of our argument. He just had the idea of varying the ratio of cut and placement. But 50x50 didn't appeal to me. Your system, on the other hand, was a continuation of the oscillator and AlexPank's system. But the subjectivity of the PLACE remains in any of these systems, as does the subjectivity of the leader's cut, but as AmberSoler put it, the subjectivity of the leader's cut in tournaments at reputable resources is so rare that you can basically ignore it. And the PLACE introduces bias across the entire line of tournament participants. The result, however, is related only to the leader's result. Draw your own conclusions - those who are still capable.

Added 7 minutes later

Maybe it would be easier to collectively and persistently ask the administration to decide on a system. Then all questions will disappear.

Yeah :) And suddenly, VDV, citing Dmitry AS as a strong player in the third game, will say that the rating should be calculated according to the system that was at the very beginning, which he proposed a year ago for his tournaments. FireBall, be honest, would such a rating suit you? As a system for calculating points to determine the winner in a tournament, it is basically normal. But I am asking you about the General rating of players on the forum?