DmitriyAS
Auto-translated
I might as well say that after systems were discussed here for a whole year (as if you haven't seen it :) you've decided to just blather right now :) Put your system up for display.
What the hell is a "champion of all tournaments on the forum"? Who runs such a nomination?? For the Kanigem tournament, the system is suitable for awarding points to determine the winner, and Sage has already explained this to you. And for calculating the General Player Rating of the forum players, such a system is also suitable—because it doesn't identify a forum champion (there is no such nomination), it simply maintains the Player Rating, and the situation was explained to you again: it is entirely permissible for the second player to have a higher RATING than the first if Player 1 lost one of the tournaments to Player 2 by a margin of 1000 times, even if they beat him in four tournaments by a margin of one day. And even if Player 1 has a lower rating, no one is taking away his championships from those four tournaments.
I'm the one charging the embrasure chest-first—while you're doing it backside-first :)\br>
I've suspected for a loooong time that your head (the one next to your breasts) and my "backside" perform the same functions. A wish for you to learn how to actually think with your head wouldn't be out of place. Who knows, it might come in handy somewhere.
Listen, you, multi-sided and multi-faceted :) You've made so many jabs in this post hinting at obtuseness, though it's obvious to a fool that you're the one who doesn't get it. Because before you, the "perceptive" one, not a single person on the forum (after the VDV system was discussed) proposed such a rating system that would consider only the PLACE. Are you going to continue claiming that you're like, the most perceptive, and everyone else on the forum is an idiot?
And Dmitry's AC system hasn't surfaced FROM THERE yet :)\br>
But that doesn't stop me from pointing out the flaws in existing ones. Including your one-legged system, whose author "barks" at everyone who "dares" to say anything in that direction. Don't idealize the situation—they gave you a toy so you wouldn't cry, or more accurately (maybe you'll understand at least this), they left you with your rating and stopped bothering you (including Amber), so as not to "get mixed up" in another polemic with you. Whatever keeps the child happy... you know the rest.
I'm sick of your stupid example, but look at how you constantly modify it :) Re-read the posts in that thread with my examples where I showed the flaws introduced by accounting for the PLACE. I'm not going to explain it separately again to someone as "perceptive" as you. Haven't you heard it's useless to cast pearls before swine? :)\br>
Obviously, you have relatives among woodpeckers. On top of all your "pluses," you're also a snitch. And I didn't intend to waste any pearls on you from the start—fortunately, you've characterized yourself perfectly.
Go ahead, describe your system and calculate the rating according to it—maybe then the flaws of such a system based on a single occupied place will get through to you.
Essentially, that's what I'm talking about—I haven't posted the system yet, and my shy friend continues to "hammer away."
Dmitry, my advice to you: first, carefully look through the threads and don't think you're the smartest. Otherwise, you'll just be the funniest.
Sorry for developing your inferiority complex. Everyone uses the resources they have in their arsenal. You've already demonstrated your "arsenal" to everyone.
Regarding your "helpful" advice, I can say that I have some as well—I'd really love to point out a couple of places to you, "you exhausted man," where you'd look great with your ruined Carthage (maybe you'll bring some new "buddies" along), but I won't do it—it's all pointless.
To be continued...
