Discussions, post-mortems, analysis, inflated egos, and all that jazz.

Remaining silent or expressing a neutral position doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of intellect, but being a coward certainly does. It's very convenient to consider openly expressed opinions as a sign of stupidity. An intellectual without a flag or emblem is just an empty shell.

There seems to be a fundamental problem with perception. It's all about making assumptions, twisting things, and making illogical comparisons.
Where did I call anyone stupid? We were talking about beliefs. Even when someone doesn't have any, imposing them into a dialogue and pretending to be intelligent is absurd. Mocking someone else's beliefs is not intelligence. And displaying a flag and emblem is a completely different matter. And in this case, intelligence is generally not required.

If you're asked for your opinion and you remain silent, you're a coward. But when there's a discussion that can perfectly well take place without you and doesn't affect your interests, why interfere? Draw your own conclusions or don't read it.

Just to reiterate, I simply asked to remove the word "please" even from the background mode. I had no idea that it would uncover so many issues and escalate into an argument. I even wrote that I didn't care anymore. But no, arguing is not my thing; it's yours.)