Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
There are two extreme viewpoints here. You voiced one. The opposite one states that it's absurd to force people to come up with a report about a draw (in a broader sense - to pay any attention to it at all) if a draw suits both of them. Well, they'll come up with something because you, as a judge, require it. Does this change the essence of the matter? It's a negotiated draw without any actual play.
It's not about inventing something, but about stating one's right to a draw. That's normal. But when a player disappears, doesn't communicate, but still receives something other than 0, that's absurd. IMHO.