Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Will leaders be unable to move with armies without a hero? If they can, then it's a flaw; the hero becomes practically unnecessary:
A leader is part of the army. Just as an army cannot exist without a hero, an army with a leader cannot exist without him. A leader is not a substitute for a hero, but rather his assistant. In my opinion, the more battles a unit wins, the stronger it should become, which is logical. This strength should be provided by the leaders. And the hero leads the ENTIRE army.