Grando
Auto-translated
Preface and Meaning
I am addressing the Arbitration Committee with an ethical question – I propose that you examine the situation and make a decision regarding this message from Sonik in connection with my second game against Miron in the SM-Masters tournament.
If I am wrong, I suggest openly stating what exactly I did or wrote incorrectly, and punishing me (including, if there is something like this, it would be useful for me to understand this in order to conduct Favorites).
If Sonik is wrong (I currently believe that this message is rude), then a decision should be made about how acceptable such statements are and whether Sonik can be punished.
The size of the punishment is determined by the Arbitration Committee. I have no approach to such situations; I just think that we are talking about disrespectful behavior. Perhaps Sonik has reasons for this. If they are justified, I want to know them reliably.
I do not think that this concerns only this specific phrase from Sonik. This concerns an unhealthy situation that has been going on for quite some time. Ideally, I would like to clarify it completely because this is not the first or second attack directed at me by Sonik, and the exact reason has been unknown for almost a year. To resolve this, one could start with this particular situation.
Description of the situation regarding the game and my logic of actions.
The game ended on a late save 141 in a situation where I was attacking the opponent. Miron withdrew from two tournaments (1,2). In Korovka's tournament, there is a rule – a report on victory in such a situation can be written if he (Korovka) looks at the save and, as a judge, decides that it is possible to talk about an advantage – and if he decides so, then the report will be confirmed.
This is what was done for this game. Another example, for which the report on the victory was not confirmed by the decision of the judge, is my save with RitoSaks.
All discussions with Miron and myself took place in private messages; the essence is that, according to this save, a decision was made – a report can be written, and it will be confirmed. Currently, it is impossible to continue playing the game; after the first viewing of the saves by Korovka, I understood from the words of the judge that Miron refused to play again, citing lack of time; after that, continuing the game was canceled, and the saves were opened.
Today, Dirty closed unconfirmed reports for all tournaments.
From the very beginning of the tournament, I performed all technical functions for Korovka regarding adding the tournament to the topic, registering participants, confirming/canceling reports; therefore, I paid attention to this and saw that Dirty missed my report.
I asked him – based on what did he close the reports? If based on information from Korovka, was there any special information about this game? The answer is no. Why didn't he confirm it? Is there any other information about this game or perhaps an appeal to the Arbitration Committee that indicates some problems? No. He processed many reports and does not remember this one.
I do not see a reason not to confirm the report. Confirmation from the judge for this game that a report can be written and should be confirmed – existed.
Since in this tournament, I also confirmed them based on information from Korovka, I confirmed it.
I am addressing the Arbitration Committee with an ethical question – I propose that you examine the situation and make a decision regarding this message from Sonik in connection with my second game against Miron in the SM-Masters tournament.
If I am wrong, I suggest openly stating what exactly I did or wrote incorrectly, and punishing me (including, if there is something like this, it would be useful for me to understand this in order to conduct Favorites).
If Sonik is wrong (I currently believe that this message is rude), then a decision should be made about how acceptable such statements are and whether Sonik can be punished.
The size of the punishment is determined by the Arbitration Committee. I have no approach to such situations; I just think that we are talking about disrespectful behavior. Perhaps Sonik has reasons for this. If they are justified, I want to know them reliably.
I do not think that this concerns only this specific phrase from Sonik. This concerns an unhealthy situation that has been going on for quite some time. Ideally, I would like to clarify it completely because this is not the first or second attack directed at me by Sonik, and the exact reason has been unknown for almost a year. To resolve this, one could start with this particular situation.
Description of the situation regarding the game and my logic of actions.
The game ended on a late save 141 in a situation where I was attacking the opponent. Miron withdrew from two tournaments (1,2). In Korovka's tournament, there is a rule – a report on victory in such a situation can be written if he (Korovka) looks at the save and, as a judge, decides that it is possible to talk about an advantage – and if he decides so, then the report will be confirmed.
This is what was done for this game. Another example, for which the report on the victory was not confirmed by the decision of the judge, is my save with RitoSaks.
All discussions with Miron and myself took place in private messages; the essence is that, according to this save, a decision was made – a report can be written, and it will be confirmed. Currently, it is impossible to continue playing the game; after the first viewing of the saves by Korovka, I understood from the words of the judge that Miron refused to play again, citing lack of time; after that, continuing the game was canceled, and the saves were opened.
Today, Dirty closed unconfirmed reports for all tournaments.
From the very beginning of the tournament, I performed all technical functions for Korovka regarding adding the tournament to the topic, registering participants, confirming/canceling reports; therefore, I paid attention to this and saw that Dirty missed my report.
I asked him – based on what did he close the reports? If based on information from Korovka, was there any special information about this game? The answer is no. Why didn't he confirm it? Is there any other information about this game or perhaps an appeal to the Arbitration Committee that indicates some problems? No. He processed many reports and does not remember this one.
I do not see a reason not to confirm the report. Confirmation from the judge for this game that a report can be written and should be confirmed – existed.
Since in this tournament, I also confirmed them based on information from Korovka, I confirmed it.