Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

You yourself stirred up the hype. If you just used your head a little.;) I will propose my system when the time and place are right. I don't think it's a good idea to apply it randomly. With your help, I've already assessed the situation.

;) As for using your head, it seems this is another example of subtle English humor. However, even if I'm not very smart, why criticize other systems as well? After all, each of them, with the exception of the VDV system, includes a component in the formula that takes into account the result, which you seem to dislike so much.

Added 6 minutes later

I'll give you another example with three Tournaments (notice, without unnecessary fuss).
Player 1: 1,1,4.
Player 2: 3,3,1.
According to your system, it's possible for Player 2 to end up higher after 3 Tournaments.
What do you call stability then!? If you continue to confuse concepts, you will much more confuse yourself and others – which you are very afraid of, explaining your aggression – than any rating system would.

And once again, it's explained to you that if Player 2 was behind Player 1 by 6 days in the first two Tournaments, and in the third Tournament, Player 2 was ahead of Player 1 by 1000 days (this is just a number to make it clearer), then, in my opinion, Player 2 looks more preferable than Player 1 in terms of results, and therefore the Player Rating should REFLECT this. And the fact that Player 1 will be the champion of this Tournament – who argues with that (just come up with how it will be determined, but why bring it into this – where have you seen a Player Rating used to determine the CHAMPIONS of Tournaments – give an example from sports :). The rating that I proposed is not obliged to determine the winners of multi-stage Tournaments – I've already said this – do you even remember the posts or do you not read them?