Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Ideally, it would be best not to respond anymore. But still, regarding the issue of argumentation and, so to speak, specifics. Otherwise, it seems strange that the topic starter sees the speck in someone else's eye but not the log in their own. Al Feyn
That's the point, you didn't think it was important to write specifically. ... Because it seems obvious to me that if someone writes at a level of detail that is not the same as Dave's, then all these writings will remain just "interesting ideas" that I will not pursue.
Al Feyn
and what about if in the game Castle vs. Elves, a Tantrum comes and wins the game? Do you think about this when you write about adding randomness? :)
Basically, one question. How many times have you lost to a Tantrum in this city pairing, on what maps, and against which players (since we're talking about specifics)?
Нам это идеально подойдёт! (с)
"Совесть - она либо есть, либо её нет" (с) RedWhait HP
MerlinTheMagician
