Where and what did I write about the fact that the situation with Tantum concerns my games personally?...
The thing about "pouring out ideas with friends" was sarcasm. Because it seems obvious to me that if someone writes at a level of detail that is not the same as Dave's, then all these writings will remain just "interesting ideas" that I will not act upon. Even if 20 people write the same thing, but without arguments.
And such writings often deserve only sarcasm in response. By creating this topic, I give you the opportunity to express your opinion, and you (many of you) are currently wasting this freedom on empty talk.
However, there is nothing new, and nothing terrible about it. Even this is better than the complete absence of this freedom. This is my position.
I will soon update the agenda, sorting the ideas that have already been expressed by their chances of being implemented.
Please do not suggest any more ideas that involve programmatically changing the implementation of something.
At least until the tournament begins. Be at least a little realistic.
It is possible if you implement it yourself. Then, of course, suggest it.
Is this a discussion about the tournament rules or about how to change the game in general?
And when we start, we can sigh about programmatic changes.
It is possible to talk about programmatic changes if someone has a real dialogue with a person who can implement them.
For example, I have a dialogue with Igromant, and I see that there is a real chance that the tournament rating will be completed, which I will most likely use in the tournament.
I definitely do not have such a dialogue with Baratortch or someone else who could write a plugin for the HD mod. Does anyone who is suggesting the corresponding ideas have such a dialogue?