Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

The rumors about my resentment are greatly exaggerated. On the contrary, I'm afraid of "scaring" you with my "harsh reality."

Well, it's hard to scare me :) I can only be knocked out – with a kick :) but not by Gendalf with his "harsh reality" ;)

If you realize that the skill of a top-tier player (which is what you're trying to emphasize in your system, considering the difference in results) lies not in how much stronger they are, but in the stability of their high results, then some things will become clearer. For me, this is a priority. That's why I prioritize the place taken in a tournament, regardless of the result itself. For you, the priority is something else.

You simply don't want to take into account the fact that the stability of results can be reflected both in the place taken and in the results themselves. In my opinion, the results are more accurate, and this is evident both from the exaggerated examples given and from the calculations already made on the tables from the Kanighem tournament, which were calculated using DIFFERENT systems. All that's missing now is a system that takes into account only the place taken. But the VDV system, which best suits your proposal, was at the origin. Moreover, in the thread about the 4th game, a rating for online games is being discussed, and I suggested a system (although I didn't invent it) where only the PLACE parameter is taken into account, plus the strength of the tournament. Take a look. If you want, calculate the rating for the Kanighem tournament using this system, applied to offline tournaments. And we'll see.

A system similar to the one I described doesn't need to be introduced yet. In my opinion, we should choose one thing for the portal, so as not to create confusion. You even agree with me on this.

That's why I'm a bit aggressive about all these new additions. What's happening is that there are already so many different systems. There are countless tables with calculations for one tournament. The organizers still haven't said which system will be used as the basis for this tournament. And suggestions continue to pour in, confusing the common people, who are already in shock from this rating topic. So please understand me correctly. If you want to prove something and show it, then calculate it using your system and show the tables while there's still time. If not, then why stir up an already controversial topic?
PS. And if you don't provide tables with your ratings based on your system, then when they choose ONE thing, how can you expect them to choose the system where only the PLACE taken is taken into account in the rating calculation?