It would be good if you didn't get involved in this childish squabble. The others have led you far away from the topic. Regarding boxing: here, you need to consider not just one match, but, say, 3 matches, two of which your knockout artist lost, and in the last one, whatever happened, happened. Based on the results of three matches, the first one won. They only give 1 point for a victory, regardless of how it was achieved.

And Sage gave you an example about the decathlon. :) But why are we comparing a stage of the tournament with an entire match and not with a round? Huh?? At least, in each version, two rounds are held in Canigame, right? It all depends on how you look at it. That's why we decided that the rating shows it more objectively.

I am not on the list of the "large group" urging you to do this, and I don't plan to be.

---
I think we need to address this issue more thoroughly – we'll come up with something together.
---
And I thought you wrote this in response to my post, to whom you were suggesting – I don't know :) But I already told you that after so many discussions, it is unlikely that anyone will agree to take into account only one PLACE.

Actually, I am not your "buddy," as you put it, and I don't allow myself to write posts while "intoxicated."

And I didn't say you were my buddy, besides, I'm not intoxicated right now. You got offended. If you were offended by the word "rylo," I meant myself. Like, you're subtly hinting about 120 kg :) You have a subtle English sense of humor, and I'm just a simple, unrefined guy – so, sorry, I'm just joking as best I can :)

Sorry, but I was an uninvited guest at this "party" (the topic about the rating), which doesn't prevent me from expressing my opinion, which, unfortunately, doesn't coincide with yours.

Why an uninvited guest? We have a situation where everyone who comes up with something (their own opinion) calculates the rating according to their own idea, comparing the results of the Canigame tournament with other calculation tables. So, let's wait for your tables from the Canigame tournament based on your system. Did I forbid you to do this, or can I even forbid you in principle, even if my opinion completely contradicts yours? What's the problem?

There, your explanations also boil down to two prepositions, "in" and "on," and there's one more – your system is the best...

And I'm proud of it :) That the system is the best. And you wanted to remove my part of the formula from all systems? Well, go ahead – describe your system and start calculating the rating for the stages of the Canigame tournament.

I hope the "crowd" you mentioned has changed their opinion, if it hasn't already...

They've known me for a long time. Carthage must be destroyed! ;)
And the fact that you don't like my explanations, well, if you don't want to understand the exaggerated examples and normal explanations that were given, at least in this topic, by Sage and Kamikaze :( ... Well, sorry, I thought maybe these explanations would be better understood? ;)