Favorites, into battle! - 11.

Auto-translated

Puzzz0

Dude, I'm all for a complete ban on "sod-serious" tournaments.
However, it's so funny to read about the aforementioned people who, at every opportunity, bring up the "Sorcerer." Seriously, it's like in school, someone said something that doesn't align with the general notions of the masses, and they start bullying him, and it's not just once, they constantly try to make it a recurring theme (it would be okay if they could do it well).
And now, what we're seeing is already a clinical case for them (presumably due to a lack of self-affirmation in real life).

Puzzz0, if you think that every time the "Sorcerer" is mentioned, you need to clutch your stomach and laugh, then you at least have problems with your sense of humor. If you think that I or someone else is bullying him, then you need to return to our reality. In fact, without any mockery or jokes, and certainly without any humiliation, I was talking about this player as he is. The fact that you don't know me makes it especially funny, considering that you're talking about my self-affirmation. But the young psychologist on the internet wants to show how smart he is, but it turned out to be so-so.

Puzzz0

I wonder, if the "Sorcerer" continues to stick to his line, will the underachievers also continue to exert their "intellect"?

You've already overwhelmed everyone with your "intellect," that's enough.

Al Feyn

What exactly is the logic?
It makes sense to include the "Restructuring" ability in games where one player plays as a "Tower" – and this would be an additional advantage for the "Tower."
Against the backdrop of "Conflict," "Necropolis," "Dungeon," and "Archangel," strengthening any of the clearly lagging cities is a good idea.
I would like to strengthen "Inferno," "Barbarian," and "Swamp" as well, but we don't know how. And here there is an opportunity, so why not use it.

And what is the logic of always including it? I, however, don't know what the logic is behind why the "Restructuring" ability for the "Library" was decided to be disabled. :D
If anyone knows, please write.

I don't know how you can consider the "Tower" a weak "Castle," given the pool of templates that exists now. The "Tower" with the "Library" is stronger than almost half of the "Castles" – if you know how to play it.
So why should cities that don't even have a fifth-tier unit, but were lucky enough to take a "Tower" or a "Village," not build a "Library," while their opponent can? I understand that in seasonal games, you can agree with your opponent before trading, but in a tournament, this seems a bit strange to me, considering that there are no programmatic obstacles.

Al Feyn

Regarding the "OH" (Overlord Heroes) – this is my response to Kaliban and Hell – I want to say the following.
The pinnacle of esports on this Portal is the Final Battle and the selection for it – OFB (Overlord Final Battle).

Here, I agree with Hell; the selection is not even a tournament; the prize is a place in the main tournament, and no medals are awarded for it. If the Final Battle will be without "OH," then I'm out; I can't imagine it in the current reality; the Final Battle might not even take place in that case.

Al Feyn

So why wasn't there a test run of "OH" on the "Polygon"? Moreover, your words only confirm mine – it should have been tested on the "Polygon."

It all depends solely on the organizer. Whatever he decides, that's how it will be. I, for example, did not participate in the OFB, precisely because of the absence of "OH."

https://twitch.tv/calibanhw

Reading content in

Interface language

Favorites, into battle! - 11.