Let them then answer and explain why, in a situation where the result for 2nd place will be 100 days compared to 5 days for the leader, their system gives the player a FREE RIDE in the ranking, isn't that right? You guys are just running around, Excel this and Excel that :)
The so-called "free ride" occurs when, after, say, 3 tournaments, the player who took 1st, 1st, and 2nd places ends up lower than the player who took 4th, 4th, and 1st places. All this is thanks to your creation. And situations vary, so I consider the case you described to be normal.
Added 5 minutes ago
I have the impression that Dmitry hasn't seen or understood the formulas used for the calculations. Otherwise, he wouldn't be writing what he's writing.
Unfortunately, I spent time studying what you came up with.;) I suggest you don't get too carried away with anyone's preferences for one or another ranking system. I think we need to look into this issue more closely - maybe we can come up with something together.
Added 9 minutes ago
No one is going to sum up days, experience, and skeletons, where did you see that? In fact, dimensionless units are summed up, which are ratios: days/days, skeletons/skeletons, experience/experience.
There was also a word that was unclear to you - "exaggerated." But what was meant was that, in the end, when compared to the sport you mentioned, it turns out that they use one unit of measurement (a constant), while in Heroes, there are 3 so far. And in all these three cases, the gaps between players can be completely different solely because of these units. And you propose to take such a gap into account.
Added 10 minutes ago
And here is AmberSoler's farewell speech when he got tired of arguing (maybe he was joking?).
Some people find it harder to communicate with you than I do. I explain a lot of your communication style by the fact that it's all virtual, and you perceive it as a game. Otherwise, you would weigh at least 100-120 kg, if you express your thoughts in this way in real life.:)