HW tournament statistics analyzer.

Why was the monster list reduced?
What is the point of a rating below 1100? In the seasonal ranking, there are only three players below 1300.
And 2400 is an unrealistic rating!

The fact that there are no such ratings at the moment does not mean that they will not appear in a year or two. No one has canceled rating inflation. In addition, the maximum rating should be difficult to achieve, as 2100 has been recently, or as 2000 was a few years ago. It's not good that about 10 people are running around with Azure Dragons. I would suggest a rating of less than 1000 for Peasants. Azure Dragon 2300+, Crystal Dragon 2250, Rusty Dragon 2200, Magic Dragon 2150, Archangel 2100. And spread the rest across the lower ratings.

I would also like to note that the density of ratings is geometric (each subsequent hundred is approximately 2 times less)

There is another side to the issue. In the range of 1400-1700, there are very large and frequent jumps in the rating in different directions. Therefore, it is not a fact that it makes sense to somehow condense the range of monsters.