=Lizard=
Auto-translated
1. I agree with Vinceras (even though he was my opponent in the last round). There should be a more flexible way to handle withdrawals, otherwise it becomes unfair. For example, half of Buchholz's score could be counted (as if they hadn't withdrawn, and all the remaining games were drawn) or something similar.
2. I agree with Jelen and Kamikaze. Banning agreed-upon draws is stupid. Players can always write a fake report and even, if necessary, provide fake saves (for example, by renaming the opponent in the saves folder). So, the honesty about a "difficult draw on move 111" looks better than that. And the claim that this draw "doesn't allow other players to compete for a spot" is complete nonsense. As Wojtek said, who prevented these players from scoring more points BEFORE the last round?
2. I agree with Jelen and Kamikaze. Banning agreed-upon draws is stupid. Players can always write a fake report and even, if necessary, provide fake saves (for example, by renaming the opponent in the saves folder). So, the honesty about a "difficult draw on move 111" looks better than that. And the claim that this draw "doesn't allow other players to compete for a spot" is complete nonsense. As Wojtek said, who prevented these players from scoring more points BEFORE the last round?