Discussions, post-mortems, analysis, inflated egos, and all that jazz.

The moral of the story? Fast timers are bad. :D Seriously though, the point is clear now, and this is already a good example. I wouldn't call such a "friendship" reliable if it falls apart so quickly in a situation like this, but I don't see the point in delving into the specifics of this terminology right now. What's more important to me is that the example confirms the idea – what kind of person you are determines what kind of "friendship" you have. Some people will calmly discuss everything, answer questions, and figure out what's really going on and why. Others will get offended and ruin the whole dialogue (and the friendship along with it).