Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
Perhaps it's time to re-elect the members of the AC, as there are worthy candidates from the current organizations or judges. I'll just list the players (organizers) I consider worthy: Sanin, korovka1987, Xocenk, plus experienced Heroes players like twaryna, HellLight, ЯR - this is a suggestion for replacing Pete and Nitro, and maybe other AC members who are tired and want to step down from their positions.
Initially, the AC was planned to have 7 members. However, there were constant situations where someone left/joined/disappeared, etc. New people were constantly being added. At one point, this became tiresome, and the decision was made that we could manage with the current composition, as the number of controversial situations decreased. Regarding re-elections, etc., I don't quite understand what the purpose is? There is no active work or anything like that happening now, nor is it expected in the near future. Just for the sake of it? Well, in my opinion, that's not a reason. If the current AC composition is unsatisfactory, let's hold a vote of no confidence or something similar. I've said many times that I'm always ready to give up my position; I'm not clinging to it. kamukag3e
After all the discussions that are taking place in this thread, I (and I'm sure other players as well) have questions that remain unanswered, and consequently, there is no understanding of how to act in a similar situation.
What prevents you from asking questions if you have them? kamukag3e
Here's a simple example: on the one hand, you suggest in this thread that Helena write a winning report for the game against Twaryna, which Helena does, and then you delete that report yourself? How are the others supposed to act after that? Many have unfinished games that are not being finished for various reasons, including the unwillingness of one of the players, who either hides this unwillingness or, as Twaryna says, states it directly. I am not without sin, and I have saves that I would like to finish, and I definitely won't finish them; I don't want to waste time on a game that has suddenly become uninteresting.
I remember that situation; I said to write a report because Twaryna said that he would not finish the game. I don't remember why I deleted the report, but most likely it was at the request of Jelen117, because I don't delete reports just like that. At the moment, the parties have no claims against each other. I just don't understand why I have to report on such things to the entire forum? :confused: