As for that situation, I meant that I didn't notice the passage. And since loading and looking again is not possible, I only noticed it after the screenshot. In personal correspondence, terminology can change, as you can see.
Also, please note that in this same tournament earlier, in a game with Graalz, I appealed to the judges with a question about a passage without guard in wasteland:

where I was forbidden to pass between two obstacles (near the Marletto tower and a pile of gold) without breaking the grand guards.
After I lost that game, on the saves I noticed how Graalz on his side, without breaking an obvious guard, collected gold at a nearby respawn. Then the following dialogue took place:
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:02):
generally probably the first time to have 8 angels on 122
TIMBUKTU 2 (30.08.2018 02:06):
why didn't you break the dogs?
TIMBUKTU 2 (30.08.2018 02:06):
and take the gold on the tie zone
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:07):
I accidentally did it mechanically
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:07):
before that Diamond was playing
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:07):
thought at first that you could go through passages
TIMBUKTU 2 (30.08.2018 02:08):
ok
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:08):
and then remembered that this is sm)
TIMBUKTU 2 (30.08.2018 02:08):
I didn't take the pile, I also had one)
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:08):
well it doesn't change the essence anyway)
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:09):
I wanted to send you 500 gold when I build the market))
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:09):
and forgot
TIMBUKTU 2 (30.08.2018 02:09):
that's a tech loss)
TIMBUKTU 2 (30.08.2018 02:09):
write the report, I'll confirm
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:09):
come on, tech loss
TIMBUKTU 2 (30.08.2018 02:09):
just kidding
graalzzz (30.08.2018 02:09):
)
Don't blame me for fabricating a tech loss; the result of the game is less important to me than what possibilities exist and whether I can use them. My decisions and actions in the game depend on that.
Сейчас