Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

How should I put it...
But what if, for example, there are 6 or 7 participants? The first completes it in 4 days, the second in 20, the third in 25, and the last in 109. And how, tell me, should we not take the result coefficient into account? ;)

Firstly, for this, a certain quorum of participants must be gathered, below which the tournament cannot "fall" (this number must be determined empirically).
Secondly, let's assume we have gathered the required number of participants (let's say 20). We take the first 10 results into account. And the gaps between them are as you mentioned. This is possible if:
- The map allows it, although, as I already said, all maps are different, and something like this may not happen again in the next tournament. Even if someone really wants to get revenge, they won't have that opportunity.
- There is a difference in the class of players. And this will always exist. If a player shows decent results, there is no need to emphasize this with such a ranking. They will achieve their high position one way or another. And in this way, due to the different possibilities of the maps, one can get so far ahead of the others in one tournament that the rest will be just a formality. The principle of competition is lost.