DmitriyAS
Auto-translated
That’s why a two-component scheme was proposed: place and result. They decided, as far as I understand, to equalize their importance – which I fully agree with, having analyzed different Tournaments.
In such a system, the components depending on the result (the leader's result – as a standard) and on the place are taken into account: according to a curvilinear function (more concave than in biathlon).
In my opinion, this is the most balanced and simple system!
You may be right, but I have expressed my opinion. In general, the goal in a Tournament does not change – to show how high a result can be achieved.
That’s exactly what Iron and I were trying to organize!
But it should only be applicable to a specific period (a Tournament consisting of several stages, or a seasonal cycle). And the overall rating should remain overall – without any exclusions.
This is, as they say, the default. Digging from morning till night – excuse me, but that’s not our style.