Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

In my humble opinion, your approach will only complicate the real picture, simply because Tournament maps differ greatly from each other. What guarantee is there that the winner's result is a benchmark that should be used as a basis?

Nothing like that. I completely disagree with you, and practice also disagrees with you. Look at all the results from the stages. The leaders of these stages have results in days that are either MAXIMUM or VERY close to the maximum on this forum. So, using the leader's result as a basis is quite logical. Otherwise, you would have to claim that only amateurs play in these Tournaments :)

And therefore, there will be a lot of subjectivity.

Come on, subjectivity :) Please don't use such language :)

I like the system used as a basis in biathlon. That's where absolutely everything is taken into account.

Yeah, but they probably don't skip Tournaments there. And in our case, this system could lead to a situation where the one who played the most games wins.

By the way, the existing rating systems also do not suit me, just like they don't suit you.

What he proposed is practically the system from IronAxe :) if you look closely.

P.S. Tournament maps provide different potential opportunities for creating a gap between one player and another. In essence, there is an unbalanced rating system that ties this very rating to the winner's result.
That is, theoretically, there is a very real possibility of creating such a gap for the winner in just one map that he will be unattainable for others, even with mediocre results in subsequent Tournaments, where the emphasis is not on the place taken, but on the gap from the winner.
You will agree that this is wrong. Therefore, it is necessary to tie the rating to the final place taken. I have proposed my version.
For clarity, you can compare Tournament maps with Besta and current Tournaments - they are completely different things...

Everything is correct here. In your opinion, is tying the rating to the leader's result in days wrong? :) And is tying the rating to the place taken by the leader (EVEN in the absence of worthy opponents) correct? :) Maybe you shouldn't confuse people, they are already confused enough with this rating. Tying places and taking them into account in the rating introduces even more subjectivity, and also encourages the development of cooperative play, when several players from a Clan can share ideas and put the rest of the crowd in their place, and according to your biathlon system, some of them will not receive a rating for the game at all :) We have already discussed all this a thousand times in the relevant topics, but you and Perpolken were not seen there! ;)