The game wasn't finished, and the technical result assigned based on an inconsistent odds ratio (which violates the tournament rules on the portal) is meaningless. :smile27:
Essentially, you weren't interested in finishing the game or the match, as you didn't contact me about the issues with the deadlines. Consequently, in the absence of information from you, the information available, i.e., from your opponent, was used. And this is an undeniable fact. Why you remained silent is your choice.
And to be honest, both of you should have been given a mutual technical defeat. This looks especially ridiculous considering that one is a judge, and the other is an experienced player. And these games are already outside of any rules and frameworks because the players violated the deadlines, which is why the approach to them is not stereotypical; otherwise, your wins would be meaningless.
And there's no need to make it up that someone set someone else up for an easy win. Although I can imagine how much drama there would be if it had affected the result. Then, we would definitely have to award a mutual technical defeat.
Normally, they could have finished the game. Or let it hang, and now Dirty will have a headache.
