Ley
Auto-translated
I disagree with that. Why should a newbie, say, catch up to someone who has been playing for 3 years in half a year? It's impossible.
And if it is possible, then the player has played a sufficient number of games, worked hard, and put in the effort, and then a fresh player comes along and somehow overtakes the other player in a week.
In my opinion, this is not entirely correct.
OptiMAL, the question arises: does a newbie never have a chance to catch up to someone who has reached the top in 3 years of playing? Is it impossible, or are you saying it will take much longer than 0.5 years? How long? - 3 years? - but then the other player will have a rating of 6 years!
So, if they play for a couple more years, do you think they will still want to compete? Life goes on - we all grow up...:)
In my opinion, it's better to immediately realize that with hard work, a "newbie" will still have a chance to catch up to the leader, a chance that is small, but still there...
After thinking about the rating system, I decided to create this method:
Rnew=2*(Ga\P + (N+(Gw-Gl)) + 2\3Rold)
Ga - the number of players; P - the place occupied by the player; N = the number of games played; Gw - the number of won games; Gl - the number of lost games; R - the rating.
It seems that everything is taken into account here.
Please, criticize)
Sincerely.
Hold on, where do you get Rold from? - just the old rating?
"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."
