Перполькен
Auto-translated
Hello everyone!
Dear VDV_forever, please register me for the tournament!
The save is ready, but I will send it at the very end of the tournament, in case I come up with something else.
Regarding Vanechka. I believe that VDV_forever is absolutely right to exclude Vanechka. It's high time to restore order, as not only Vanechka but also other participants indirectly give hints to all tournament participants, sometimes without even realizing it.
My opinion: Once the tournament has started, there should be no discussion about it (even indirect)! You can only submit an application for the tournament, notify that you have sent the save, and greet new arrivals (however you like). If any questions arise about the tournament itself, write them to the organizer personally. And if you want to chat, there are other topics not related to this tournament.
Regarding the lectures: Why is this topic even needed? For those who think that their knowledge is insufficient, I can give this advice: Download FizMig and read it carefully, and also read the Hall of Fame.
Vanechka, don't be upset, this would have happened sooner or later! Maybe not with you, but with someone else. There just needed to be a reason to enforce discipline! Now everyone will be more careful in their statements.
I had an idea regarding the ranking (for next year)
The person who takes first place receives 100%, and all others receive (%) depending on the task in the tournament and the result of the first-place winner.
Example:
Time trial tournament. If the 1st player completes it in 200 days, they receive a 100% ranking; the 2nd player, completing it in 201 days, receives 99.5% because (1% = 2 days, and 1 day = 0.5%).
Tournament for experience and skill point collection: If the 1st player scores 20,000, they receive 100%; the 2nd player, scoring 17,000, receives 85% because (1% = 200).
According to this formula, players who show poor results may not receive a ranking at all (in principle, they don't need it)! But those who do receive it will be able to realistically see the ratio of their result to the results of others.
Because, when you look at the table, you are surprised by what people are given a ranking for, just for participating? And sometimes it turns out that the 1st and 10th players have approximately the same result, but the ranking is completely different, and the same applies to the 10th to 20th places.
There is also an idea to replace: the sum of skills with the amount of experience. Experience more accurately reflects the player's strength. There will be no easy wins from the computer. Replace mercury with gold, as this is more accurate. In these two cases, identical results are very rare.
Goodbye everyone, with respect, Perpolken!
Dear VDV_forever, please register me for the tournament!
The save is ready, but I will send it at the very end of the tournament, in case I come up with something else.
Regarding Vanechka. I believe that VDV_forever is absolutely right to exclude Vanechka. It's high time to restore order, as not only Vanechka but also other participants indirectly give hints to all tournament participants, sometimes without even realizing it.
My opinion: Once the tournament has started, there should be no discussion about it (even indirect)! You can only submit an application for the tournament, notify that you have sent the save, and greet new arrivals (however you like). If any questions arise about the tournament itself, write them to the organizer personally. And if you want to chat, there are other topics not related to this tournament.
Regarding the lectures: Why is this topic even needed? For those who think that their knowledge is insufficient, I can give this advice: Download FizMig and read it carefully, and also read the Hall of Fame.
Vanechka, don't be upset, this would have happened sooner or later! Maybe not with you, but with someone else. There just needed to be a reason to enforce discipline! Now everyone will be more careful in their statements.
I had an idea regarding the ranking (for next year)
The person who takes first place receives 100%, and all others receive (%) depending on the task in the tournament and the result of the first-place winner.
Example:
Time trial tournament. If the 1st player completes it in 200 days, they receive a 100% ranking; the 2nd player, completing it in 201 days, receives 99.5% because (1% = 2 days, and 1 day = 0.5%).
Tournament for experience and skill point collection: If the 1st player scores 20,000, they receive 100%; the 2nd player, scoring 17,000, receives 85% because (1% = 200).
According to this formula, players who show poor results may not receive a ranking at all (in principle, they don't need it)! But those who do receive it will be able to realistically see the ratio of their result to the results of others.
Because, when you look at the table, you are surprised by what people are given a ranking for, just for participating? And sometimes it turns out that the 1st and 10th players have approximately the same result, but the ranking is completely different, and the same applies to the 10th to 20th places.
There is also an idea to replace: the sum of skills with the amount of experience. Experience more accurately reflects the player's strength. There will be no easy wins from the computer. Replace mercury with gold, as this is more accurate. In these two cases, identical results are very rare.
Goodbye everyone, with respect, Perpolken!
Все гениальное-просто!
:) F A I R :) P L A Y[/COLOR]:)