Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I had an idea (maybe it's not new, but I haven't heard of it).
Make it so that neutral creatures can't start morale checks in the first round. And after that, it's random, as always. If this is technically possible, it would save many games that suddenly end with absurd situations like Ifrits starting a morale check in a narrow passage, or being broken down into 6-7 units in the creature bank, etc.
Lizard, as a very skilled player, you calculate a huge number of possible scenarios, not neglecting even the most complex ones. Why don't you pay attention to the morale of neutral creatures? It's a gamble. Attacking in the creature bank with low-level units is a real risk, just like using the Moon to attack a hive with 7 units in the second round to burn down the dragonflies – in my opinion, that's a real risk. Couldn't you have broken down against the neutral creatures guarding the Cyclops, or at least taken one stack that could withstand more than one hit? Of course, I'm not trying to teach an elephant how to fly, but risk is risk, and we're playing by the same rules. Please understand me correctly, if anything...