Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
At first glance, what De Luxe wrote would actually decrease the importance of the rating. Because those with a low rating will end up in the lower bracket and still have excellent chances to climb out of it, without even risking encountering the top 8. And the top 8 will be battling each other, not just long before the final stages, but from the very first round. :smile11:
Here are my suggestions:
1. For groups.
Absolutely standard, even distribution into tiers. The number of tiers is equal to the number of places in the group. Like in the FIFA World Cup.
Consequence: the lower your rating, the greater the chance of playing against stronger opponents, and vice versa.
2. For the playoffs.
At each stage, everyone is divided into three groups.
"Top-1/3" is guaranteed to play against "Bottom-1/3".
"Middle-1/3" plays among themselves.
If it doesn't divide evenly, it's easy to round to one side or the other.
For example, for 32 people:
the top 10 will play against the bottom 10, and the middle 12 will play among themselves.