Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Zhenya and Kostya. Could you calculate the proposed scheme by Khosenko in comparison to the one you consider correct (by the way, which one is it?), so that it would be immediately clear from a specific example why and where exactly it is "lol"?
Keep in mind that it is quite obvious that Khosenko is trying to solve the classic (and correct) problem of "favorites" – to allow the favorite faction to play longer, even if they lose in the first few games (here, everyone will play at least 4 games). And at the same time, solve the problem of meaningless games that no longer have any impact in a competitive sense (here, there will be no meaningless games for anyone at all – if you are playing a match, it means you can still win the tournament).