Trying to turn a fan-made, cute game built on an engine from the last century (yes, that's the same analog landline phone) into a modern financial platform is, at the very least, irrational.
For example, I have absolutely no idea what the Creator of this site's motivation is, but I think he is a philanthropist.
By the way, the copyright holders might take an interest in this, strangely enough.
In general, I'm not selling or even distributing their product or parts of it. I'm selling a service and functionality of my own development. The only thing is that their brand is sometimes used (for example, the logo in the launcher), but I can easily get rid of it: "Heroes" - no, "for Heroes" - yes.
GameRanger does (in the case of the lobby) approximately the same thing and earns money from advertising and paid gold accounts. The creators of the paid Exagear earn money for the ability to run Heroes on Android.
And I am more than sure that neither the authors of GameRanger nor Exagear have any agreements with Ubi or permissions from them.
Yes, my product is integrated into the game itself, and this is impossible without reverse engineering the original. And reverse engineering Heroes is prohibited by the user agreement and, therefore, by the law of the Russian Federation, at least.
But in case of real problems, I can move the lobby functionality with HotA to external software without significant loss of convenience for users.
He, as a programmer, is well aware of all these kinds of shareware or proprietary applications...
I earn money by repairing, servicing, and selling bicycles.
If I were a real programmer, I would have spent those 9 years that I spent on Heroes on much more profitable programming.
And the dynamics of income will be on a downward trend.
I won't pay for any software in principle, because it's not worth it.
I read this as: "I won't pay for software because it's not worth a penny" and, therefore, as:
"the labor and time spent on creating this software are not worth a penny."
I can understand such a justification of one's position: "Suck my long cock stupid fat fuck, I have better ways to get rid of my money, papashka shit. Go search better ways", or something like: "the author has completely lost it", but what you wrote - no.
It is obvious that money plays a role here. And not some kind of progressive aspirations of players to save time.
I myself used HotA when possible. It saves time. But there is also a huge problem when the course of events is disrupted. This has happened more than once in a tournament. And a lot of time and emotions are spent on analyzing the situation.
And if there are problems, why not state them, clearly formulating them? And why not suggest solutions?
Sir Davos even wrote somewhere recently about a lot of bugs in HotA, among which there are significant ones. But what these bugs are - is apparently a secret.
последняя версия - 5.0 RC96 (19.09.2020)
последнее видео: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u70wC0DJ7I8
полное подробное описание