Skip to content

Discussion about Heroes 4.

User Avatar
#102
Auto-translated
Solllmir;110920
However, the third game was still a great game. The fourth Heroes simply continued the logical system of innovations, and as a result, it turned out to be a completely different game.
Since you are such an expert, please explain which specific innovations the third game continued from the second :) And then I will tell you about the innovations that the fourth game continued - okay?
Solllmir;110920

In my opinion, if there were no previous parts, the fourth Heroes would be a good game, but against their background, it is complete garbage.
I can just as easily argue that against the background of the fourth game, all other versions are complete garbage. The argument is that the functionality of the fourth game easily surpasses all versions combined :)

Added 7 minutes ago
Solllmir;110920
In my opinion, if there were no previous parts, the fourth Heroes would be a good game, but against their background, it is complete garbage.
Please provide your results from any of the versions of Heroes from any other resources to our studio. And then I will listen to you carefully, sewer worker :)

Added 9 hours 4 minutes ago
OptiMAL;110936
I certainly love the fourth game, but dear Zubr and Leshy... don't attack those who are criticizing the fourth game here. What is the topic called? Exactly. Let them express their personal opinion:)
The topic is called a discussion about Heroes 4. And the discussion about those who Zubr, Leshy, and I attack boils down to the fact that Heroes 4 is not good and that's it, as Zubr correctly noted. Moreover, I am more than sure that people who make such statements do not know how to play any of the versions of Heroes properly. If I am wrong, let them provide a link to any of their officially registered results on the Internet, because I don't care how cool they play one-on-one with the computer in a dark room :)
If the topic was called "Your purely personal attitude towards Heroes 4", then I would still understand such negative statements, expressed without proof and in the style in which they do it, although even in such a topic it would still look stupid :)
PS. I know many cool players in the third game who have good results in tournaments on it, but they are fundamentally not playing the fourth game. However, I have never seen such pearls about the fourth game from such people here. This suggests that normal players, even if they are good at one of the versions, usually have their heads on straight, unlike some :)