Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Their clan leader was slightly stronger than the ordinary guards of a "weaker" clan.
This is easily explained. When you go one-on-one after school, with knives, on Dust II, two of you, but without ultimates, and you, having spent two days on specialized leveling and honing your build for a one-shot kill, immediately use your ultimate before your opponent even has time to react, it's not surprising that you win.
And ordinary warriors folded very easily, even under our complete encirclement, without archers, and with the inability to use all melee fighters.
But I disagree here. As far as I remember, they were lousy archers, and they also couldn't use their own melee fighters, and again, half of them died from the alpha strike, but even so, they managed to get five kills, or even more. If we had clashed clan against clan, I think they would have given us a hard time. And a guy with lower combat ability should have an even weaker army and be weaker himself, with worse equipment. Unless he separately hired some mercenaries for his protection.