Preparing for the "Van Kanegem" tournament.

How can you expect someone to compete for the title of "all-rounder" if they aren't an all-rounder (ONLY PLAYING TWO OR THREE VERSIONS OF THE GAME)?

Not two or three versions. I didn't say that. I suggested that a player should play at least THREE versions. Those who play a larger number of versions can simply discard their worst results (meaning they will have a choice). In my opinion, this is realistic and sufficient for the title of "all-rounder." At the same time, more people can realistically participate in the competition for this title and provide competition to the contenders.

Otherwise, only three people will realistically play all stages in all versions, and I've already named them. The others won't have that chance. Consequently, these three contenders will most likely compete for the title of "all-rounder," as they will accumulate points from a larger number of stages than the other participants. Well, if you don't want to increase the number of real competitors, that's fine with me; it's not that important to me anyway – it would just be more interesting to see a more intense competition.

Nomination for "all-rounder," but the winner doesn't play in two out of five versions:eek:

And now what? Should we hang ourselves? But he plays in three out of five versions. Why isn't that enough for the title of "all-rounder"? What does it matter if there are many combinations of who is an all-rounder in what? But only three people will play all stages in all five versions.
Added 2 minutes ago
[/U]

It works, but he has little chance of becoming the best all-rounder[/COLOR] if he has "0" in the other parts;)

That's what I'm saying: it turns out that the three of us will essentially decide the competition for the title of "all-rounder," which isn't very interesting. And if FireBall and I hadn't played one of the versions, you would have had a great competition for the title of "all-rounder." :)