Preparing for the "Van Kanegem" tournament.

So what's unfair about that?... if a person doesn't play Heroes 4 and 5 (for example), then how can they be considered a "universal" player?
So, who are you criticizing?

He's a great "universal" player when it comes to Heroes 1, 2, and 3, isn't he? Someone else might be better at Heroes 2, 3, and 5. But how do you describe someone who plays THREE versions out of FIVE? Doesn't the term "universal" still fit???