Preparing for the "Van Kanegem" tournament.

Scoring systems exist :) We have dozens of them, but it is still UNKNOWN which one will be used to determine the winners. The question remains open :) Therefore, it is still possible and necessary to discuss it.

And if you don't want to, then don't discuss it - no one is forcing you to :) And I don't care much where the moderators move these posts. I believe that this thread relates to the Canighem tournament; we are discussing the system for calculating the winners of this tournament - therefore, these posts do not violate the topic of this thread.

PS. Maybe you are interested in the fact that the winners of the overall standings will be chosen only from among us: Axe, Alex_R, and Fireball, but I am not very interested. The more contenders for the winners, the more interesting it will be, and even if I am kicked out of the top three or top five, that is secondary. But then the value of victory will be greater in case of success!! :) Alex_R, don't be afraid - we will all reach the finish line!

I am definitely against the proposal to calculate the overall standings based on one result from each stage. It will be the same thing. Simply, those who did not play all the stages, namely stages 4 and 5, will have their results from only THREE stages counted, while those who played in all versions will have their results from FIVE stages counted. It is clear that their chances increase significantly, and therefore the number of contenders for the overall standings decreases.