Preparing for the "Van Kanegem" tournament.

That’s exactly what I’m saying. If you exclude four rounds, for example, two from the fifth version and two from the fourth, then how can it be considered a universal champion? I believe that the absolute champion should be determined by the sum of, for example, the eight best stages. And a universal champion should be determined by the sum of the five best stages, one from each version!
Here is such a suggestion.